Hendrik Tews (TU Dresden) |
Marcus Völp (TU Dresden) |
Tjark Weber (Uppsala University) |
In recent projects on operating-system verification, C and C++ data types are often formalized using a semantics that does not fully specify the precise byte encoding of objects. It is well-known that such an underspecified data-type semantics can be used to detect certain kinds of type errors. In general, however, underspecified data-type semantics are unsound: they assign well-defined meaning to programs that have undefined behavior according to the C and C++ language standards.
A precise characterization of the type-correctness properties that can be enforced with underspecified data-type semantics is still missing. In this paper, we identify strengths and weaknesses of underspecified data-type semantics for ensuring type safety of low-level systems code. We prove sufficient conditions to detect certain classes of type errors and, finally, identify a trade-off between the complexity of underspecified data-type semantics and their type-checking capabilities. |
ArXived at: https://dx.doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.102.8 | bibtex | |
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org |
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org |